Posts Tagged ‘National Science Foundation’

The Learning Science in Informal Environments Study in Context

Sunday, May 2nd, 2010

by David A. Ucko

Abstract

The National Science Foundation (NSF) funded the National Research Council report Learning Science in Informal Environments to synthesize the growing body of diverse research underlying informal science learning. Intended outcomes were to establish a base for future research, to provide evidence-based guidance for those developing and delivering informal learning experiences, to broaden the definition of “learning” beyond that typically used in formal education, to encourage knowledge sharing across the heterogeneous informal science education field, and to provide a measure of external validation for the value of learning in informal settings. NSF investment in this study is part of a larger ongoing effort by the Informal Science Education program to advance knowledge and practice and build capacity in the field.

Get the full article.

  • David A. Ucko (ducko@nsf.gov) is division director (acting) of the Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

A Conversation about Intended Learning Outcomes

Sunday, October 11th, 2009

by PINO MONACO AND THEANO MOUSSOURI

Recently, the Smithsonian Institution addressed the challenge of coordinating the articulation of intended learning outcomes for educational programs. Pino Monaco, and Theano Moussouri, got together to discuss the Generic Learning Outcomes (GLOs), and a similar framework proposed by the National Science Foundation in the U.S., as concrete guidelines to provide tangible and assessable shapes to learning outcomes.

Issues discussed and still open for elaboration rotated around the concept of intentionality – why is the informal education community still discussing whether we should or should not have intended outcomes in mind when we facilitate a learning experience?

Furthermore, after presenting examples of how outcome-based evaluations could be integrated within our current practices, the authors recognized the need for further pondering, especially concerning the issue of “measuring learning outcomes.”

  • Isn’t a measurement in contrast with a free-choice learning experience?
  • How do we measure fun and enjoyment?
  • Instead of measuring, could we gather and describe?

Feel free to join the conversation in the Forum by adding your comments below.

Bad Behavior has blocked 47 access attempts in the last 7 days.